* Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-24 23:45]: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:48:39PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > Yes, I have been doing things wrongly in the past, but this is not the > > case anymore. The Changed-By fields are correct now. See, for instance, > > my last upload: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/11/msg01728.html > [upload of octave2.9_2.9.4-7] > > | Maintainer: Debian/IA64 Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Changed-By: Debian Octave Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Could you please explain to me why having Changed-By as a mailing list in this case (a binary NMU done by an autobuilder) is problematic? You may have good reasons for thinking Change-By should list a real person , but I fail to understand it. Notice that I am not religious about this ML versus person issue in the debian/changelog entry. If the majority of developers think we should do one way or the other, I will comply with the decision and do the necessary changes at the DOG (the Debian Octave Group, in case you did not yet get the acronym). I would like just to understand the rationale, though. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
