Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:13:48PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: >> Hello Debian developers, >> >> When doing research about circular-deps, I looked at a lot of packages >> that are split between a binary package and a data package. This is a >> good thing since this reduce the total siez of the archive, however >> there are simple rules that should be followed: >> >> 3) Keep the files that 'signal' executables in the same package than the >> executable (e.g. menu file, program manpage). > > Why? I agree that it menu files and manpages are generally not that > large, but what would it break to have them in pkg-data? > (I would consider it strange to have such files out of the main pkg > package, but it looks policy-compliant as far as I can see...) > > > Nicolas
foo depends on foo-data. But foo-data does NOT depend on foo. So an "apt-get install foo-data", while being useless, is consistent for dpkg. After that you would end up with a menu entry for foo but no foo binary. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]