On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:52:05 +0100, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Nov 13, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Can you explain exactly how a CC copyleft-like license would have
>> > been an obstacle?
>> Because it is being incorporated in a larger work: My
> So it looks like you have issues with all licenses not compatible
> with the one you choose, being them DFSG-free or not.
Err, did you not read? I said the core of the effort was the
presentation; and the license I used obviously had to be
compatible. Proceeding to dot the i's and cross the t's, the project
can grow, and be incorporated into Debian, no matter which DFSG free
license Colin had selected; since my work was based on his, obviously
my license had to be compatible.
The point is this: had the original license not been free,
none of the rest would have grown up to potentially be included in
Debian -- and thus the fact that the original license was free was
critical.
manoj
--
Imitation is the sincerest form of television. Fred Allen
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
