Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 17:31 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> Being system-runtime independent is a great goal, but helping free >> software is a better one. Releasing dpkg under the LGPL would allow >> people to build proprietary software on top of dpkg, and we (for the >> most part) don't see that as desirable. > > Or may be make it CDDL dual licensed.
Which would allow people to build proprietary software on top of dpkg. I don't see how that helps. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
