Nick Jacobs wrote: > In-Reply-To=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You mean, it's seriously been proposed that a > significant amount of work should be done to restore > support for a processor that has not been manufactured > for 10 years? While slightly degrading performance for > the 99.99999% of x86 users who have Pentium/Athlon/or > better?
Maybe renaming Debians "i386" into something more accurate like "x86" or even "IA32" (in consistency with IA64) would suppress discussions like this in the future? Kind reagards Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
