On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 11:51 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I think the question is: do you want all the goodies or you don't want > all the goodies?
Well, the problem is, when "all the goodies" is a significant number of packages, it is tedious to have to collect them all myself. > I would not object to a meta package gnome-without-games if the gnome > maintainers want to add one. And what about the user who said "and evolution"? So far we have gnome-without-games, gnome-without-games-and-evolution, and (logically) gnome-without-evolution. Care to add a few more exceptions and all of their permutations? :) > I would love a way to have a negative way of handling the whole darn > thing. I thought tasks were supposed to get rid of metapackages > anyway. Sure. So did I. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
