* Paul Boekholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-28 14:38]: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:03:21 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > I would keep the first version really short. The only two things that > > are important for now is the package naming, the installation directory > > for the modules, and maybe the dependency relationships. The upstream > > Makefile for slgdbm installs the module in > > /usr/share/slsh/local-packages, but I moved it to /usr/share/slsh. > > Rather it installs the module in /usr/local/lib/slang/v2/modules, and a > gdbm.sl script in /usr/local/share/slsh/local-packages, which is probably > what you mean.
Yes, this is what I meant, sorry. > > Suggests: slsh (>= 2.0) | jed (>= 0.99.17) | slrn (>= 0.9.8.1pl1-4) > > Well, it is possible to compile the gdbm module with slang 1 - of > course you'd have to edit the Makefile to install in v1/modules. The question is: can a module compiled with SLang2 be loaded by Slang1 ? In other words, is there binary backward compatibility? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
