On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:22:27PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > That's not only "must have 50 users" but more a "must have 50 users that do > stuff on those machines". > See, that's the problem, when you don't define those rules exactly: what > qualifies for a "user" - how often needs the user on the machine, how much > time must he waste there, and so on and so on?
Come on -- seriously, if a port has a problem demonstrating 50 users in a form that is acceptable to the release team, it has a problem anyhow. Heck, almost every port I can think of (perhaps except s390) should be able to easily gather 50 people on IRC from a machine running that architecture, announcing “hey, I'm a user!” :-) I do not seriously think this will be a blocked for any realistic architecture. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
