Hi, * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-13 01:07]: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:47:33AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > Hi, > > If you go through the list of wnpp bugs you will see alot of > > open bugs which are very very old. > > Especially the RFPs. What about closing an RFP bug > > automatically after the third semi automatic notice mail > > which is sent to the BTS entry? > > Or have a cron job that automatically closes them after a period of > inactivity? With or without three automatic nags?
Yes that another possibility. I think the only way to handle RFPs which makes sense is to give a period of time (a year or so) and if the bug has not been retilted to ITP in this time delete the RFP. In a year many things (licenses too :) can change in software development so if someone is interrested in a piece of software he can write a wnpp again. If nothing changes in this period of time upstream is inacive and the software shouldn't be packaged. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred
pgpsJnZAo1eeg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
