On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:21:51PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There should be TWO libcurls, with DIFFERENT names, and then >> applications can simply link against whichever one they want, instead >> of the current approach, which totally breaks, violates policy, and >> doesn't really help much of anyone. > I really need to support your request. I agree (and had already suggested such) but it seems to have been ignored out of hand. Hence my later suggestion, which is suboptimal buts seems to be verbose enough to not be ignored. ^_^ Unless I missed something earlier in my search for users of those callbacks, or the gnuTLS support in libcurl is broken (apart from not supporting the callbacks which are the root of this discussion) I don't see why gnuTLS cannot be just slipped in underneath libcurl with no packages the wiser. gnuTLS has versioned symbols, right? -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED] "No survivors? Then where do the stories come from I wonder?" -- Capt. Jack Sparrow, "Pirates of the Caribbean" License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.1/au/ -----------------------------------------------------------
pgpvG7o0OjBJm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
