Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems the only oposition to this thus far is the choice of venue clause, > which i am perosnally dubious of it falling the DFSG (as readers of > debian-legal my know, and others can search for QPL and ocaml there).
There's a far more serious problem, which has nothing to do with the DFSG - the FSF's interpretation of the GPL forbids us distributing GPLed binaries linked against a non-GPL compatible C library. Whether it's free or not, the CDDL is certainly not GPL-compatible. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
