On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:42:54PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Francesco P. Lovergine: > > > > >> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process > > >> resource in NPTL, so NPTL probably has the problems, and LinuxThreads > > >> doesn't. > > > > > > A question: why using file locking instead of thread mutexes (which > > > is the proper answer to syncronization issues in a thread-safe > > > architecture)? > > > > SQLite databases (and Subversion repositories) are intended to be > > opened concurrently by multiple processes. > > > > That's obvious, Florian pointed a limit on a per-thread locking, > not a per-thread one. So what?
Err, I meant 'not per-process one'... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
