In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Would it be acceptable to reject or drop more non-spam? (We could
>I am uncomfortable with dropping any mail, but I encourage a sensible
>policy to reject spam.
Sorry if I did not make it clear before, we already are dumping
100,000 messages/day into files noone ever looks at other than in
unusual situations. (If someone reports having a problem getting a
message through to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I do grep through them. This happens a
few times a year.) The only thing being discussed is how aggressive
the spam filters are tuned, not if we do it or not.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
