Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> For more information see: >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00007.html > This reference doesn't help with the question of libraries that use > C++ internally but don't expose a C++ interface.
You are absolutely right about that. However, like vorlon, I had trouble remembering where the original discussion took place, so I supplied this link instead. If you inspect libfam.so.0.0.0 with readelf, you will see that it technically does export some C++ symbols. However, since none of those symbols are documented as part of the fam API, changes in those symbols should be pretty harmless. -- Chuan-kai Lin http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~cklin/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]