On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:55:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:16:53PM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > > > - security team, DSA, and release team must not veto inclusion > > > > Arbitrary veto power. This requirement is unacceptable for me. Noone > > should be allowed to just ignore other peoples work within the project. > > This is one argument I do have sympathy for. In fact, I went to that > meeting with the exact same thought. > > The thing is, however, that you're dealing with a madman scenario: > you're afraid that one day, a member of one of the above teams will go > crazy and declare that they don't like this person that works on a port, > or just that port entirely. Or, less extreme, you're afraid that a > member of the above teams will make a judgement error and veto a port > for bogus reasons.
You know, the wording of the original vancouver document, as well as the mood of the discussion that followed it seems to be pretty near such a madman scenario, so ... Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
