Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The constitution also states that no developer can work actively against
> the implementation of such a decision made by the project[0]. Not doing
> the work and not letting anyone else do it would constitute 'working
> actively againt'.

Quite the contrary; it seems to me that this is to work *passively*
against something.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to