Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 07:01:37PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: >> On Saturday 20 August 2005 02:20 pm, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> > How does their extensive use of it explain why they would reimplement >> > it? >> >> Is there anyone who's used CVS extensively and HASN'T thought about >> reimplementing it? > > Judging by the number of revision control systems springing up out there, > I'd say the answer to that question is "No, and furthermore most of them > have gone further than just thinking about it".
Huh? None of those reimplement cvs, they produce replacements. arch and svn and bitkeeper are *not* reimplementations of cvs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
