On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:29:51PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Wouter Verhelst]
> > b) the three beforementioned teams could already refuse to > > support a port anyhow, simply by not doing the work. > This is not really a valid argument. If a team in debian refuses to > accept decisions made by a majority of debian developers, or rejects > democratic control, this team will just have to be replaced by the DPL. It's a perfectly sensible thing to say here: from a purely practical point of view this *could* happen and all the proposal says here is that that isn't really on. Instead it says that people need to tell people why they don't want something to go ahead - discuss things rather than passively blocking them. That seems like a good starting point for dealing with the conflicts that are likely to occur if this happens both here and in other areas. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
