-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21-08-2005 03:58, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> We also came to the conclusion that some of the requirements proposed in > Vancouver would make sense as initial requirements -- requirements that > a port would need to fulfill in order to be allowed on the mirror > network -- but not necessarily as an 'overall' requirement -- a > requirement that a port will always need to fulfill if it wants to be > part of a stable release, even if it's already on the mirror network. > Those would look like this: [snip] > Overall: [snip] > - binaries must have been built and signed by official Debian > Developers Currently, sponsored packages are only signed, not built, by official Debian Developers. Is that intended to change, or is it a typo in the proposal? Please cc me, as I am not subscribed to d-devel. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDCLnWn7DbMsAkQLgRAseqAJ0ZueM27PSaFXodL8KOtg0MQp7tzACgpm16 KrJIgM9u/LeAdulAN6/YdS4= =eir/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
