On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 11:10:04PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > (1) keep vulnerable packages in stable, > (2) remove affected packages from distribution, > (3) allow new upstream into stable. My 1 cent would be a merge of (2) and (3)... it is more of the formalization so we woudln't need to think about it on a next occasion with some other package
(2) - remove from the stable distribution
(3) - create /rolling-updates or whatever better name would be in a
fashion like /security-updates.
Drawbacks:
users who had mozilla installed would need to tune their
/etc/apt/sources.list, although some dummy transitional package
"mozilla" which wipes out vulnerable pieces from stable can do it for
them (debconf)
Advantages:
* stable is kept stable - no unstable parts in the main body. It would
provide clean and sharp boundary between stable and "rolling" packages
if more to come for some reason
* conciseness addition of /rolling-updates helps to understand why then
hack apt-get upgrade goes crazy so often and download staff into
stable distribution
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
pgpzJSLTQLKL6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
