On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 21:21 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> And how is this going to be fixed? The broken version
> number might be much higher than upstream's version
> number. AFAIK there is no way to turn it back, is it?

The maintainer could use an epoch to fix it. (It's like a 1: prefix.)

>       2.5.130.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1
>       2.5.13-0.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1

Is it really important to have the 0 split away? I think while dashes
are perfectly valid when there is a Debian revision they are not really
loved by the maintainers.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to