On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:05:51PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support? > > > Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe > > > to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
> > What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing > > submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header > > is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would > > happen without even needing to confirm the subscription... but that's > > still undecided.] > As an update to this, AJ has posted a note on the stuff he'd like to see > in the BTS[1]. This really relates to his point 4 relating to the > refactoring of the mail distribution. Expect more on the subject in the > upcoming future. This is nice to see. IME, as a release manager/bug triager and as a member of package maintenance teams, the distributions I want to be able to use for bug mails are: - to the submitter and to the maintainer (most common) - to the maintainer only and IME as a sole maintainer of packages, the distributions I want are: - to the submitter only - "-quiet" It would be great to see each of these mail distribution targets available as a single destination address on bugs.d.o, and even better if the reply-to's on bugs mail were set so that I never had to fiddle with headers again when replying to bugs :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
