* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:31:48 +0200]: > If spam e-mail is going to start closing our Bugs in the BTS then we > should start thinking about implementing authentication checks in the > BTS... like for example: do not allow control messages or -close > messages with no attached (valid) GPG/PGP signatures (from a valid > developer?)"
I see much more feasible to require a pseudo-header: less cumbersome, higher probability of getting implemented, and more in accordance with the philosophy of our BTS. And such header is now needed to make a versioned closes, so it doesn't sound too disruptive to require it for every mail to -done (at least the Source: one, Source-Version could be optional). Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]