On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:00:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Andreas Tille] > > if you ask me any bug is worth fixing, also if only a single user > > complained about the problem. So why spending effort in "rating" > > bugs? > > To get some indication on the order the bugs should be solved in? As > we have limited time and people, it is smart to start with the bugs > affecting most people. >
I can only see usefulness for QA team (orphaned) packages. A properly maintained package should have a thinking machine (maintainer) who is able to discriminate what's a spurious bug and what's not. That could be useful to create a priority list for QA team jobs, but I wonder if it's better than the proposed popcon approach. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
