Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:52 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [snip]
>> So I would say just drop libaspell15c and reupload anything that was
>> already wrongfully uploaded again.
>
> What does that do to people who have already installed libaspell15c2,
> and are in the middle of the cut-over?
>
> [snip]
They get the libaspell back when they upgrade aspell-bin.
Same thing that happened that made them get libaspell15c2.
amd64:~% apt-cache rdepends libaspell15c2
W: Unable to locate package libaspell15c2
Nothing happens on amd64, alpha or ia64.
i386:~% apt-cache rdepends libaspell15c2
libaspell15c2
Reverse Depends:
aspell-pl
logjam
libtext-aspell-perl
libpspell-dev
libgtkspell0
libenchant1c2
libaspell-dev
gedit
gaim
balsa
aspell
aspell
All those would need a quick reupload.
The reason I'm against introducing a dummy package is that it will
cause those packages listed above to depend on different packages
(libaspell15 vs libaspell15c2) depending on the architecture. Without
dummy package they are forced to make a new upload at the proper time.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
