Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:01:03PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: >> > The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin (>> 0.60). >> > aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual >> > packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be >> > satisfied. >> > >> > There are fifteen such packages: >> >> I'd see a benefit in filing mail beforehand for a change, but >> after-the-fact, I have an impression that it's better to >> file bugs on the packages since it's easier to track the problem that way. >> >> Unless there is a chance of reintroducing aspell-bin package, >> that should probably be the case. >> >> I think this is the call of aspell maintainer. > > Brian, are you planning to reintroduce the aspell-bin package or > should I file bugs against the packages that fail to build? > > -- > Matt
And could someone please please please fix the current aspell first: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316666 It is realy pointless fixing and uploading anything with Build-Depends on aspell as long as it is uninstallable. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
