On 10352 March 1977, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > During one of the talks of Debconf (I think it was about shared library > packaging) there was a complaint that tracking upstreams SONAME changes > means that your library package will end up in NEW each time it really > changed.
And? Hows that bad? > I'd like to suggest fixing the scripts to only flag packages as new if > it isn't obviously just one of these SONAME changes. As I don't really > know katie etc. I don't know how complicated this is so I don't just > start to work on it know but ask if it would make sense to others. I vote against it. Nice example just arrived yesterday: "Just" an soname change, maintainer didnt fix his scripts, no files installed in .debs. Simple, nice, example against automated addition of files. -- bye Joerg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
