Hi Steve,

Thanks for your email.  I'd like to say touche but I basically believe
you are wrong.  Unfortunately I found from past-personal experience that
email to busy people is generally ignored unless brought to their
attention.

Additionally personal personality conflicts between myself and press
contact would practically guarantee that.  At any rate, I had hoped that
my email was being constructive (or that it could spaark a constructive
discussion) but that doesn't appear to have been the case.

I had hoped that others would have noted:

        - the most recent PR does not have any indication of embargoed
          status.  Is it for immediate release?  Should it be held
          briefly?

          Most organisation use embargoed press releases so that when
          important events happen (e.g. a Debian release) everything can
          be prepared in advance and happen simultaneously.

        - no 'about Debian' section

         Even smaller projects like Gnome has a section detailing, who
         they are, a brief outline of their goals, etc.  We place great
         value on things like the Social Contract and the DFSG and we
         should have a similiar section which mentions them -
         particularly for journalists who are not familiar with Debian
         this may be a great 'teaser' in an article about us.

         A good example one is
         <URL: http://gnome.org/press/releases/guadec2006-location.html>

         - nothing about debconf

         The Gnome release, above, highlights where the next GUADEC will
         be; how many Press Release have their been highlighting the
         current debcamp/debconf?  

There are other additional issues, all of which are technical -- since
press release are essentially 'cookie-cutter' things.  The last issue is
related to timelyness and my belief that quite a number of developers
have taken on too many roles within the project -- to the detriment of
the project.

Once again, thanks for your email, I personally didn't like the tone but
I do take your point. I just happen to diagree with it.

Regards,
Anand

-- 
 `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to
  its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are
  forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how
  holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to