On Monday 11 July 2005 22.18, Roger Leigh wrote: > Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Monday 04 July 2005 11.51, Horms wrote: > >> I am not sure about 3.4's ability to compile 2.4.27, but > >> it seems unlikely to me that all of the gcc versions you mention above > >> will be omitted from etch. > > > > I'm quite confident that the release team and/or gcc maintainers will > > agree that 'is needed to compile 2.4 kernels' is a big enough reason to > > keep some gcc version around if Debian gets to the point to decide > > which old gcc versions should be shipped or dropped. > > We even have GCC 2.7.2 in unstable (gcc272). Does anyone actually use > this anymore, or could it be removed for etch?
Some embedded people who still use Linux 2.0 + uclinux?
Not sure at all, but that's what we used not that long ago (around 2000;2.4
was long out then, so 2.0 was already ancient. Ok, it is a bit long ago,
but still...)
greetings
-- vbi
--
Die Veränderlichkeit der Naturkonstanten scheint eine Idee zu sein,
deren Zeit gekommen ist. Nur die Natur ist noch nicht so weit.
-- Max Rauner, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 21.4.2004
pgp2oOGL8UdU8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
