* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I wrote: > > If what we are doing does not actually infringe their trademark we would > > not be getting any special privileges. > > Eric Dorland writes: > > What we are doing already is against their trademark policy. We're being > > offered an agreement specific to Debian to bypass that. I would call that > > special privileges. > > If their policy is not legally enforceable our users have all the rights we > have whether we accept the agreement of not.
If their policy is not legally enforceable then we've wasted a lot of time discussing it. Do you have any backup to this claim? -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
