Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You could help by listing the anti-spam measures that you consider to be > acceptable. Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not helpful.
I am ok with anti-spam measures which enable a well-behaving false positive sender to know they have run afoul, and in which the maintainers of the mechanism promise to try and adjust the system so that the false-positive in question doesn't recur, taking responsibility for false positives. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
