* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:08:36PM +0200, Rapha?l Hertzog wrote: > > Le vendredi 17 juin 2005 à 14:09 +0100, Andrew Suffield a écrit : > > > > You could also, as a courtesy to other readers, lay before us the > > > > stunningly obvious proof that a free software that elects to use > > > > trademarks automagically transmutates into non-free state. > > > > > > That would be the part where the trademark holder tells you that you > > > can't distribute modified versions. > > > > The Mozilla Foundation explicitely gave us that right (or at least they > > are ready to give us this right because they trust us). > > After they first told us that we couldn't distribute modified > versions, that was one of several outcomes of debian-legal's > investigation into this matter, yes. There were several others, too.
Sorry Andrew, which investigation are you referring to? Which other outcomes? You've got some context there I'm not getting. > Oddly enough, I *do* know what happened. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
