Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've got experience with use of greylisting for a mail platform with > over 1M accounts. Enabling greylisting for this platform reduced > delivered spam with 80-90%. This is simply because most of the > infected machines does not attempt a second delivery of a mail > connection terminated with a 4xx (temporary) error message.
How many complaints for messages not delivered did you get? I do _not_ want to have my debian.org mail forwarding go through a greylisting "service". I've had to deal with one too many user complaints due to greylisting. If it is a configurable service, then fine, other people may have different experiences, but if greylisting becomes a mandatory feature, I guess I have to start using non-greylisted (ie. non-Debian) addresses in my Debian correspondence. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
