Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That there is such a hue and cry over rebranding Firefox in Debian > indicates to me that it *is* a significant burden we would be (and are > now) asking of our downstream users.
Well, one, *we're* not asking our downstream users to do that. The Mozilla Foundation is. I'm not sure how much that distinction matters, but it feels worth stating to me. Second, the real problems with rebranding are not with the technical work that has to happen, from the sound of it. They're with user recognition and the ability of users to find the right package for something they want to run. That *is* a significant issue, at least in my opinion, but Debian taking that hit doesn't do *anything* to help our downstream users. They still end up having to either take the same hit or now undo Debian work to get back to the name that their users will recognize. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]