On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:43:36PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 15 juin 2005 à 13:27 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : > > Fine. And we also agree that the basis for that is the DFSG? If so, > > where does the DFSG speak about trademarks at all? > > > > The license of firefox is DFSG free. There is no discussion about. > > No, it isn't. And that's what we should be talking about, instead of > trademark non-issues.
Actually, trademarks are all we're discussing here. Some say that the license applied to that trademark is not DFSG-free, but that doesn't matter -- the DFSG isn't about trademarks, nor can it be. -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
