** Marco :: > > The MPL has much worse than the choice of venue: the "keep the source > > online" clause, which we (and most other distributors) are violating. > I do not believe that this makes it non-free, but I encourage the > ftpmasters to investigate if our infrastructure can support such a > license.
How would something that makes the licensee spend US$ 50/year (at least) to make a derivative work be free? Even Free as Speech? To be DFSG-free, a software must be distributed in such a way that the licensee can use, distribute, modify, and distribute modified with _no_ _strings_ _attached_. Minimum wage is US$ 100/month down here, you know? This is *not* a reasonable burnden on the licensee... -- HTH, Massa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
