* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Eric Dorland: > > > 1. Completely ignore their Trademark Policy document and let MoFo come > > to us if they're not happy with our use of the marks. > > This is the policy we have adopted with PHP, Apache and > similarly-licensed software. It's basically the only choice when we > want to continue to distribute software such as phpGroupWare or > Apache::Request.
That's true, but in Mozilla's case they have a document that is very specific about what can and can't be done. PHP and Apache don't have such documents as far as I can see, so it's easier to take a passive approach. > In the Firefox case, the trademark situation is extremely murky > because in many countries, the Mozilla Foundation doesn't even own > that trademark WRT to computer programs (examples: Germany, United > Kingdom). Looks like someone didn't do his or her homework before > choosing the name. 8-( -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
