On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Hey Adeodato, > > Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 04:29 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó: > > but on the > > packaging side they work as closely as possible: common VCS repository > > and whatever. > > This sounds really cool. > > > > specially for non-experienced packagers, doesn't help here > > either (correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that getting a sponsored > > upload to universe happens faster and more easily than a sponsored > > upload to sid). > > We get those people there. Our NEW packages policy states that every > completely new package has to be reviewed by at least 3 maintainers or > MOTUs. The packages in question are in a pretty good state and the MOTU > hopefuls work incredibly hard to get into it. > > > > - an ITP is filed if they intend to search a for a Debian sponsor > > and maintain the Debian package themselves, otherwise a RFP is > > submitted > > To be honest, I wasn't that familiar with the Debian administrative > devices, but if these measures help in any way, I will discuss it in the > MOTUMeeting ( http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTUMeeting ). Hi Daniel, check out: http://debian.home.pipeline.com/ and look for the newdebian2.png for a somewhat accurate idea of how things work. Comments/questions welcomed. Cheers, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
