On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:32:14AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > occasions that their patch policy is less than optimal. While some > personally agree with me, it's their policy and unfortunately it won't > change... however, maybe there's still hope, now that more people are
Has there been any explanation for the policy? I'm having a hard time thinking of any sensible reasoning. Obviously there's no problem with posting the patches on the web and including a pointer to them, or doing that if the patch is particularly enormous. It's just insisting on doing it all the time but regardless of what usptream want that seems odd. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
