[Matt Zimmerman] > I don't have any hard statistics, but here are some random examples of > patches whose development was sponsored by Canonical, were tested and proven > in Ubuntu, were proactively submitted to Debian by an Ubuntu developer, and > remain in debbugs months later without comment from the maintainer: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298060
This one got lots of comments from the defacto maintainer of the shadow package, Christian Perrier. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298064 This one was left in silence. So half of the random examples were left in silence, and the other half got serious considerations. Good to know. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
