On Tue, 31 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:45:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Or do you _really_ want to release sarge with many dozens of already > > > known and fixed bugs? > > > > I'd worry about it more if we hadn't suffered from the same or similar > > problems with ever previous Debian release, TBPH. Even back when we froze > > unstable, this just pushed certian bugfixes out of the archive entirely. > >... > > How can this happen whenyou freeze unstable?
I guess you will not understand at each other if you use the term "freezing unstable" with two different meanings. I see that the term may have at least two meanings: * "frozen" is created initially as a copy of unstable. After this, frozen and unstable evolve separately, unless you upload some package for "frozen unstable", as we did in the old days. I bet Adrian would not call this a proper freeze of unstable, as it would be the "frozen" distribution who would be really frozen, not unstable. * "unstable" is actually frozen, which means uploads for unstable are either discouraged, they remain in the limbo, or they are automatically put in some other distribution above unstable, like new-unstable, until testing or unstable becomes the new stable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
