On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:47:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > But setting up autobuilders doesn't require a new infrastructure
> > (and shouldn't require more than half a year).
>
> In this case, it did because of scalability issues. This was known and
> publicised for quite a while; so either you're being deliberately
> obtruse now, or you didn't properly do your homework before sending that
> post.
Sorry if I'm too dumb, but I do still not get it.
Perhaps I'm confused becaused it's called _testing_-security - but it
is never used for testing and therefore seems to not be required for
security support in testing.
Where exactly are the publicised scalability issues?
Are the stable-security autobuilders not capable of handling two stable
releases (AFAIR they were at potato/woody times, but my memory might be
wrong)?
Yes, I might be too dumb for understanding this issue.
Please give me dumb person a simple explanation when the
testing-security infrastructure will actually be used.
TIA
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
