On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:02:32AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Kevin Mark] > > that would suggest that its the RM who has decided such issues in the > > past unilaterilly. > > Conventional wisdom is that release management involves so much > drudgery and so little recognition that the *least* we can do is let > the release manager decide on codenames and version numbers.
Hi Peter,
I have no difficulty with a decision being made unilaterially. I'd just
prefer to have it stated <<somewhere>> so that people wont debate
something like this near the end of the release cycle and so that folks
who are creating dead-tree media would not have worry that things wont
be in sync, which would be somewhat detrimental to Debian as not being
organized and professional.
cheers,
Kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
`$' $'
$ $ _
,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b
,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$
$$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $
`$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $
`Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
