No need. I already have an ITA on it. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306670
On 5/8/05, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:02:51AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: > > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:38:39PM +0200 , Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:23:51PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > > > The NMU is very simple... I don't have a problem with doing it myself in > > > > a week or two. > > > > > > > > Just try to catch Petr first. > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > Eh, (1) there is a standing 0-day NMU policy for very long already (at > > > least half a year, don't remember even), (2) two weeks definitely is too > > > late, I suggest NMU'ing ASAP, (3) no need to start the "MIA procedure" > > > thingy when just doing a NMU, everyone gets busy once in a while, a NMU > > > is not a bad thingy, just an attempt to help out a maintainer who > > > otherwise apparantly couldn't find the time to fix a particular issue. > > > As #288741 is 120 days old without maintainer reaction, there was > > > > I sent a ITO last july and I thought that it took someone. There were some > > license problems IIRC, but it seems it's solved now. > > Hm, it's a custom to send O: bugs to the BTS, so that they get tracked, > rather than "ITO", something that doesn't have much meaning in Debian > (either you want to continue maintaining pending looking for a new > maintainer, than it's "RFA", or you don't, that it's "O", both filed as > bugs for tracking purposes). > > > As it seems that soneone has yesterday orphaned phpdoc for me (wtf?) I don't > > have to do it myself :-) Anyone is welcome to take over maintaining phpdoc > > Ok, I'll file an O: bug then unless that's meanwhile been done. > > Sorry for the noise & mess. > > Thanks, > --Jeroen > > -- > Jeroen van Wolffelaar > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) > http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl >
