Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Should we change some of these to /usr/libexec? > > well, it would be against the FHS, I think. > > The BSDs use libexec but I don't really see a good reason why it exists.
GNU project stuff also uses libexec (by default; I don't know if that location gets overridden in debian builds). E.g., if you build your own emacs, notice it installs various helper programs in /usr/local/libexec/emacs/... I don't know if there's an argument for it other than clarity and warm fuzzies. [I personally think that if a good idea is "against the FHS", the right answer is to change the FHS.] -Miles -- Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here, beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
