* James Treacy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050501 21:15]: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:40:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I have to confess this is mainly because I maintain both > > packages.debian.org and packages.ubuntu.com and just copied the code. > > If anyone has suggestions how to improve the wording on the Ubuntu > > part, my email adress is in the footer of every page ;)
> Having written the bulk of the code that generates these pages, > I am flattered that such old code still has any use, let alone > a new one with Ubuntu. > > Of course, as others have pointed out, you need to implement a > mechanism to ensure that packages auto-generated from Debian are > stated as such and give an Ubuntu address where users can get support. Actually, I don't think that the packages.*-code is part of the problem. Ubuntu treats the Debian maintainers at many places as "their" maintainers, e.g. at apt-cache show $package. The packages.*-code just displays that wrong information. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
