El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 04:36, Glenn Maynard escribió: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > > El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió: > > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote: > > > > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. > > > > > > For which the simple answer is: > > > Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml > > > > I have the same question around for some months. > > I have read the link above but I didn't find any reply. > > Any extra clue? > > Those of us on d-legal have no idea what your question is; please restate > it. :)
Sorry: El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:37, Maciej Dems escribió: > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion. > > Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any invariant > section have to go to non-free as well? > > As I understand the problem, such documentation is free and only can loose > its freeness in the future. But the same can be told about eg. any > BSD-licensed program. >
