On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:08:50AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > If it contained only editorial changes as you are saying, you've thereby > proven that your statement the documentation licencing was "firmly > decided" was wrong.
The SC ratified by SC2004-003 is abundantly clear: documentation must be Free, according to the DFSG, and nothing short of another GR will change that. I believe this to be obvious and self-evident. (The rest is tangental, and this conversation has too many mini-threads, so I'm leaving it at that.) -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
