On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:04:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:52:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > As you say, _most_ of the issues are triggered by one of those three > > chips, not all. And, by not making a hard requirement to compile the > > packages which will not be used, you are not holding the project back > > waiting for m68k's KDE. Probably m68k will _never_ compile KDE, as I > > doubt their buildds are ever idle > > kiivi.cyber.ee, the unstable m68k buildd that I maintain, is usually > idle for about 30% of the time. /Of course/ we build KDE, there's no > point in not doing that. >
Why, does it get used on this architecture? (Serious question, I have no idea). regards Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
