On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 02:26:34PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Sun, April 3, 2005 05:39, John Hasler said: > >> For instance, let's say we are a food company. Why not check to see if > >> the food is rotten before it gets to the consumer? > > > > That's what Unstable is for. > > Why, if tests can be automated, do we have a need to go through the > process of spreading a package to mirrors, have people install it and file > bug reports by hand? (Often these reports are a day later already > out-of-date because it was just a matter of time.) Isn't one of our > strenghts that we can automate what we can so we can use our time for all > those tasks that are left?
Good idea! Let's make a new repository of packages that only receives new packages that have their dependencies fulfilled. We need a good name for such a repository. How about "testing"? -- Petri Latvala The house of sarcasm
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
